<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rhode Island Genealogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net</link>
	<description>Rhode Island Genealogy and History resources, links, information and articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rhode Island and King Philips War</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2011/11/11/rhode-island-and-king-philips-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2011/11/11/rhode-island-and-king-philips-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhode Island and King Philips War During the 17th century a war erupted in colonial America that was fought throughout Rhode Island. King Philips War, named after the Native American called Metacom who was referred to by colonists as Philip, saw fierce fighting between Native Americans and the settlers in Rhode Island. King Philips war was not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Rhode Island and King Philips War</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">During the 17</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">th</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">century a war erupted in colonial America that was fought throughout</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><a href="http://www.ri.gov/"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Rhode Island</span></span></a><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">. King Philips War, named after the Native American called Metacom who was referred to by colonists as Philip, saw fierce fighting between Native Americans and the settlers in Rhode Island. King Philips war was not isolated to Rhode Island, and battles were fought in other settled areas of America. But this war was the final struggle fought by the Native Indians of Rhode Island. When the war had ended the various tribes that lived in Rhode Island had to relinquish any power they once held in the area over to the British.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The build-up to war</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The outbreak of war has been attributed to both long term and short term causes. In the long term, relations between colonist and native Indians became increasingly strained over time because of the constant increase of settlers arriving in the Rhode Island area. This meant that resources became less abundant and disputes over land began to flare up. Another long term reason for the conflict was the foreign diseases like smallpox, typhoid, and measles that spread among the Native American tribes as quickly became pandemics.</span></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span id="more-369"></span>But it was the short term causes that really sparked the beginning of the war. It is thought there are three main sparks to why the war broke out at this time, one being the suspicious death of Metacom’s brother, Wamsutta. In 1662 Wamsutta was visiting governor Josiah Winslow for peaceful negotiations, but shortly after he left the town he collapsed and perished. The circumstances were strange and Metacom was suspicious about why his brother died.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Good relations between British colonists and Native Americans dwindled after this incident, and resulted in underhand tactics by British settlers trying to obtain land. Colonists would ply the local chiefs with alcohol so that they could get them to sign land sale papers, which was illegal and caused much friction between the two groups. Behaving like unscrupulous</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><a href="http://www.quotezone.co.uk/lorry-insurance.htm"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">lorry insurance</span></span></a><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">salesmen, the colonists refused to stop doing this when asked by the local natives, and soon the stage was set for battle to commence.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Retaliation from both sides</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The final straw was when a Native American called</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sassamon"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">John Sassamon</span></span></a><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">, who had converted to Christianity and acted as a translator for Metacom, secretly told officials from the Plymouth Colony that plans to attack colonial settlements were being made by King Philip. Sassamon was murdered for his betrayal shortly after news broke out, supposedly by a few men from the Wampanoag tribe loyal to King Philip.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">This lead to three Wampanoag being arrested by Plymouth Colony officials, who were put in trial for murder and subsequently hanged on the 8</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">th</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">of June 1675. Less than two weeks later, a raiding party from the Pokanoket tribe lay siege to the small settlement of Swansea, and destroyed it within five days.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The reprisal to this attack was swift, and on the 28</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">th</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">of June a military force was sent to a Wampanoag town located at Mount Hope, which lay on the site of modern-day Bristol in Rhode Island. The town was completely destroyed and the stage was set for all-out war between Native Indian tribes and Colonists.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">King Philips War begins</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Skirmishes spread between Native American tribes and Colonists throughout the summer of 1675, and on the 9</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">th</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">of September the New England Confederation officially declared war on the Native Americans. Battles took place in both Massachusetts and Connecticut over the next couple of months, and on the 2</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">nd</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">of November Josiah Winslow led a force into Rhode Island to attack the Native Americans living there. They burned several Native American towns as they advanced through the state, but local natives had already retreated to a fort located at modern-day South Kingstown. The battle that commenced here is remembered as the Great Swamp Fight. The fort was burnt down and most of the Narragansett tribe’s winter stores were destroyed.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Colonists on the run in Rhode Island</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The war continued and the Native Americans gained the upper hand in spring 1676, successfully raiding settlements deep into the colonist’s territory. It was reported that nine colonists were tortured and killed after being captured in Cumberland, Rhode Island. A metal plaque has been placed in the area the men are thought to have been buried, and is still in place today.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">Colonists in Rhode Island left the area and moved to larger, more secure settlements. On the 29</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">th</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">of March 1676 the capital of Rhode Island, Providence, was burned to the ground by Native Americans, although all settlers had already fled. For some time after this the only settlements inhabited by settlers were Newport and Portsmouth.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The Defeat of King Philip</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The war waged on throughout the spring and summer of 1676 and slowly the Colonists gained the upper hand, as both sides became determined to completely eradicate the other. The Native Americans were dwindling in numbers against a larger colonial force, which resulted in many native Indians surrendering to the colonial militias roaming through Rhode Island.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">King Philip returned to a place called Assowamset Swamp, close to Mount Hope. It was here that the war started and this was the place it would end. Raiding parties of colonists and Native Americans swept through the area and eventually hunted King Philip down. On the 12</span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><sup><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">th</span></span></sup></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #000000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">of August 1676 King Philip was shot and killed, the later beheaded, drawn and quartered. This head was put on display in Plymouth for the next twenty years, and this event marked the end of the war in Rhode Island.</span></span></span></p>
<div id="wherego_related"> </div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=369&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2011/11/11/rhode-island-and-king-philips-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Independence Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2011/07/04/happy-independence-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2011/07/04/happy-independence-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to wish all of you a Happy Independence Day. May you enjoy this day to reflect on the liberty that our forefathers (and foremothers) have fought to protect and pass down through the generations. I have posted a longer essay at my North Carolina Genealogy site with a deeper question: Where is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to wish all of you a Happy Independence Day.  May you enjoy this day to reflect on the liberty that our forefathers (and foremothers) have fought to protect and pass down through the generations.   I have posted a longer essay at my North Carolina Genealogy site with a deeper question:  <a href="http://www.northcarolinagenealogy.net/2011/07/04/where-is-the-4th-of-july/">Where is the 4th of July</a>.</p>
<div id="wherego_related"> </div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=365&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2011/07/04/happy-independence-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/28/roger-williams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/28/roger-williams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Williams (circa 1603 – between January and March 1683) was an American Protestant theologian, and the first American proponent of religious freedom and the separation of church and state. In 1636, he began the colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, which provided a refuge for religious minorities. Williams started the First Baptist Church [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Williams (circa 1603 – between January and March 1683) was an American Protestant theologian, and the first American proponent of religious freedom and the separation of church and state. In 1636, he began the colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, which provided a refuge for religious minorities. Williams started the First Baptist Church in America Providence before leaving to become a Seeker. He was a student of Indian languages and an advocate for fair dealings with Native Americans.</p>
<p><span id="more-359"></span><br />
</p>
<p>Williams was born into the Church of England in London, England, around 1603. At age 12 he had a conversion experience of which his father disapproved. His father, James Williams (1562–1620), was a merchant tailor in Smithfield, England. His mother was Alice Pemberton (1564–1634).</p>
<p>As a teenager Williams apprenticed with Sir Edward Coke (1552–1634), the famous jurist, and under Coke&#8217;s patronage, Williams was educated at Charterhouse and also at Pembroke College, Cambridge (B.A., 1627). He seemed to have had a gift for languages, and early acquired familiarity with Latin, Hebrew, Greek, Dutch, and French. Years later he gave John Milton lessons in Dutch in exchange for refresher lessons in Hebrew.</p>
<p>Although he took Holy Orders in the Church of England, he had become a Puritan at Cambridge, forfeiting any chance at a place of preferment in the Anglican church. After graduating from Cambridge, Williams became the chaplain to a Puritan lord, Sir William Macham. He married Mary Barnard (1609–76) on December 15, 1629 at the Church of High Laver, Essex, England. They had six children, all born in America. Their children were Mary, Freeborn, Providence, Mercy, Daniel and Joseph.</p>
<p>Williams was privy to the plans of the Puritan leaders to migrate to the New World, and while he did not join the first wave in the summer of 1630, before the end of the year, he decided he could not remain in England under Archbishop William Laud&#8217;s rigorous (and High church) administration. He regarded the Church of England to be corrupt and false, and by the time he and his wife boarded the Lyon in early December, he had arrived at the Separatist position.</p>
<p>When Roger and Mary Williams arrived at Boston on February 5, 1631, he was welcomed and almost immediately invited to become the Teacher (assistant minister) in the Boston church to officiate while Rev. John Wilson returned to England to fetch his wife. He shocked them by declining the position, saying that he found that it was &#8220;an unseparated church.&#8221; In addition he asserted that the civil magistrates may not punish any sort of &#8220;breach of the first table [of the Ten Commandments],&#8221; such as idolatry, Sabbath-breaking, false worship, and blasphemy, and that every individual should be free to follow his own convictions in religious matters. Right from the beginning, he sounded three principles which were central to his subsequent career: Separatism, freedom of religion, and separation of church and state.</p>
<p>As a Separatist he had concluded that the Church of England was irredeemably corrupt and that one must completely separate from it to establish a new church for the true and pure worship of God. His search for the true church eventually carried him out of Congregationalism, the Baptists, and any visible church. From 1639 forward, he waited for Christ to send a new apostle to reestablish the church, and he saw himself as a &#8220;witness&#8221; to Christianity until that time came. He believed that soul liberty freedom of conscience, was a gift from God, and that everyone had the natural right to freedom of religion. Religious freedom demanded that church and state be separated. Williams was the first to use the phrase &#8220;wall of separation&#8221; to describe the relationship of the church and state. He called for a high wall of separation between the &#8220;Garden of Christ&#8221; and the &#8220;Wilderness of the World.&#8221; This idea is one of the foundations of the religion clauses in the U.S. Constitution and First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1802 Thomas Jefferson, writing of the &#8220;wall of separation&#8221; echoed Roger Williams in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association.</p>
<p>The Salem church was much more inclined to Separatism, so they invited Williams to become their Teacher. When the leaders in Boston learned of this, they vigorously protested, and the offer was withdrawn. By the end of the summer of 1631, Williams had moved to Plymouth colony where he was welcomed, and informally assisted the minister there. He regularly preached and according to Governor Bradford, &#8220;his teachings were well approved.&#8221; </p>
<p>After a time, Williams felt disappointed that the Plymouth church was not sufficiently separated from the Church of England, and his study of the Native Americans had caused him to doubt the validity of the colonial charters. Governor Bradford later wrote that Williams fell &#8220;into some strange opinions which caused some controversy between the church and him.&#8221;[5] In December 1632 he wrote a lengthy tract which openly condemned the King&#8217;s charters and questioned the right of Plymouth (or Massachusetts) to the land without first buying it from the Indians. He charged that King James had uttered a &#8220;solemn lie&#8221; when he asserted that he was the first Christian monarch to have discovered the land. Subsequently, he moved back to Salem by the fall of 1633 and was welcomed by Rev. Samuel Skelton as an unofficial assistant in the church.</p>
<p>The Massachusetts authorities were not pleased to see Williams return, and when they learned of his tract attacking the King and the charters, he was summoned in December 1633 to appear before the General Court in Boston. The issue was smoothed out, and the tract disappeared forever, probably burned. In August, 1634 (Rev. Skelton having died), Williams became acting pastor of the Salem church and continued to be embroiled in controversies. He had promised earlier not to raise the issue of the charter again, but he did. Again, in March 1635 was ordered to appear before the General Court to explain himself. In April he so vigorously opposed the new oath of allegiance to the colonial government that it became impossible to enforce it. He was summoned again before the Court in July to answer for &#8220;erroneous&#8221; and &#8220;dangerous opinions,&#8221; and the Court declared that he should be removed from his church position. This latest controversy welled up at just the moment that the Town of Salem had petitioned the General Court to annex some land on Marblehead Neck. The Court would not consider the request until the Salem church removed Williams. The Salem church felt that this order violated the independence of the church, and a letter of protest was sent to the other churches. However, the letter was not read, and the General Court refused to seat the delegates from Salem at the next session. Support for Williams began to wane under this pressure, and when Williams demanded that the Salem church separate itself from other other churches, his support crumbled entirely. He withdrew and met in his home with a few of his most devoted followers.</p>
<p>Finally, in October 1635 he was tried by the General Court and convicted of sedition and heresy. The Court declared that he was spreading &#8220;diverse, new, and dangerous opinions.&#8221; He was ordered to be banished. (This order was not repealed until 1936 when Bill 488 was passed by the Massachusetts House.) The execution of the order was delayed because Williams was ill and winter was approaching, and he was allowed to stay temporarily provided he ceased his agitation. He did not cease, so in January 1636 the sheriff came to pick him up only to discover that Williams had slipped away three days before. He walked through the deep snow of a hard winter the 105 miles from Salem to the head of Narragansett Bay. There he was rescued by his friends, the Wampanoags, and taken to the winter camp of their chief sachem, Massasoit.</p>
<p>Settlement at Providence</p>
<p>In the spring of 1636 Williams and a number of his followers from Salem began a settlement on land that Williams had bought from Massasoit, only to be told by Plymouth that he was still within their land grant. They warned that they might be forced to extradite him to Massachusetts and invited him to cross the Seekonk River to territory beyond any charter. The outcasts rowed over to Narragansett territory, and having secured land from Canonicus and Miantonomi, chief sachems of the Narragansetts, Williams established a settlement with twelve &#8220;loving friends.&#8221; He called it &#8220;Providence&#8221; because he felt that God&#8217;s Providence had brought him there. (He would later name his third child, the first born in his new settlement, &#8220;Providence&#8221; as well.) He said that his settlement was to be a haven for those &#8220;distressed of conscience,&#8221; and it soon attracted quite a collection of dissenters and otherwise-minded individuals.</p>
<p>From the beginning, the settlement was governed by a majority vote of the heads of households, but &#8220;only in civil things,&#8221; and newcomers could be admitted to full citizenship by a majority vote. In August of 1637 they drew up a town agreement, which again restricted the government to &#8220;civil things.&#8221; In 1640, another agreement was signed by thirty-nine &#8220;freemen,&#8221; (men who had full citizenship and voting rights) which declared their determination &#8220;still to hold forth liberty of conscience.&#8221; Thus, Williams had founded the first place in modern history where citizenship and religion were separated, a place where there was religious liberty and separation of church and state.</p>
<p>In November 1637, the General Court of Massachusetts disarmed, disenfranchised, and forced into exile the Antinomians, the followers of Anne Hutchinson. One of them, John Clarke, learned from Williams that Aquidneck Island might be purchased from the Narragansetts. Williams facilitated the purchase by William Coddington and others, and in the spring of 1638 the Antinomians began settling at a place called Pocasset, which is now the town of Portsmouth, Rhode Island. Some of the Antinomians, especially those described by Governor John Winthrop as &#8220;Anabaptists,&#8221; settled in Providence.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the Pequot War had broken out, and it was a great irony that Massachusetts Bay was forced to ask for Roger Williams&#8217; help. He not only became the Bay colony&#8217;s eyes and ears, he used his relationship with the Narragansetts to dissuade them from joining with the Pequots. Instead, the Narragansetts allied themselves with the English and helped to crush the Pequots in 1637-1638. When the war was over, the Narragansetts were clearly the most powerful Indian nation in southern New England, and quite soon the other New England colonies began to fear and mistrust the Narragansetts. They came to regard Roger Williams&#8217; colony and the Narragansetts as a common enemy. In the next three decades Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Plymouth exerted pressure to destroy both Rhode Island and the Narragansetts.</p>
<p>In 1643, the neighboring colonies formed a military alliance called the United Colonies and pointedly excluded the towns around Narragansett Bay. The object was to extend their power over the heretic settlements and put an end to the infection. In response Williams was sent to England by his fellow citizens to secure a charter for the colony. The English Civil War was in full swing in England when Williams arrived. The Puritans were then in power in London, and through the offices of Sir Henry Vane a charter was obtained despite strenuous opposition from agents from Massachusetts. Historians agree that the key that unlocked the door for Williams was his first published book, A Key Into the Language of America (1643). Printed by John Milton&#8217;s publisher the book was an instant &#8220;best-seller,&#8221; and gave Williams a large and favorable reputation. This little book was the first dictionary of any Indian tongue in the English language and fed the great hunger of the English about the Native Americans. Having secured his precious charter for &#8220;Providence Plantations&#8221; from Parliament, in July 1644 Williams then published his most famous book, The Bloudy Tenent of Persecution for Cause of Conscience. This produced a great uproar, and Parliament responded in August by ordering the book to be burned by the public hangman. By then, Williams was already on his way home to Providence Plantations. Also, by then, the settlers on Aquidneck Island had renamed their island &#8220;Rhode Island.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because of opposition from William Coddington on &#8220;Rhode Island,&#8221; it took Williams until 1647 to get the four towns around Narragansett Bay to unite under a single government, and liberty of conscience was again proclaimed. The colony became a safe haven for people who were persecuted for their beliefs including Baptists, Quakers, and Jews. Still, the divisions between the towns and powerful personalities did not bode well for the colony. Coddington, who never liked Williams nor liked being subordinated to the new charter government, sailed to England and returned in 1651 with his own patent making him &#8220;Governor for Life&#8221; over &#8220;Rhode Island&#8221; [Aquidneck] and Conanicut. As a result, Providence and Warwick dispatched Roger Williams and Coddington&#8217;s opponents on &#8220;Rhode Island&#8221; sent John Clarke to England to get Coddington&#8217;s commission canceled. To pay for the trip, Williams sold his trading post at Cocumscussec, near present-day Wickford, Rhode Island. This trading post was his main source of income. Williams and Clarke were successful in getting Coddington&#8217;s patent rescinded, but Clarke remained in England until 1664 to secure a new charter for the colony. Williams returned to America in 1654 and was immediately elected the President of the colony. He would subsequently serve in many offices in the town and colonial governments, and in his 70s he was elected captain of the militia in Providence during King Philip&#8217;s War in 1676.</p>
<p>One notable effort by &#8220;Providence Plantations&#8221; (Providence and Warwick) during the time when Coddington had separated &#8220;Rhode Island&#8221; (Newport and Portsmouth) from the mainland came on May 18, 1652, when they passed a law which attempted to prevent slavery from taking root in the colony. In 1641 Massachusetts Bay had passed the first laws to make slavery legal in the British colonies, and these laws spread to Plymouth and Connecticut with the creation of the United Colonies in 1643. Roger Williams and Samuel Gorton both opposed slavery, and the law passed in 1652 was the attempt to stop slavery from coming to Rhode Island. Unfortunately, when the parts of the colony were reunited, the Aquidneck towns refused to accept the law and it became a dead letter. The economic and political center of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations was Newport for the next 100 years, and they disregarded the anti-slavery law. Indeed, Newport entered the African slave trade in 1700 and became the leading American slave traders from then until the American Revolution.</p>
<p>By 1638, Williams&#8217; ideas had ripened to the point that he accepted the idea of believer&#8217;s baptism credobaptist. Williams had been holding services in his home for some time for his neighbors, many of whom had followed him from Salem. To that point they had been like the Separatists of Plymouth, still believing in infant baptism. Williams came to accept the ideas of English antipedobaptists.</p>
<p>John Smyth, Thomas Helwys, and John Murton were co-founders of the Baptist movement in Britain, and produced a rich literature advocating liberty of conscience. Williams certainly had read some of their writings because he commented on them in his Bloudy Tenent. While Smyth, Helwys and Murton were General Baptists, a Calvinistic Baptist variety grew out of some Separatists around 1630. Williams became a Calvinist or Particular Baptist (Reformed Baptist).</p>
<p>However, Williams had not adopted antipedobaptist views before his banishment from Massachusetts, for antipedobaptism was not a charge levelled at him by his opponents. Winthrop attributed Williams&#8217;s &#8220;Anabaptist&#8221; views to the influence of Katherine Scott, a sister of Anne Hutchinson, the Antinomian who may have impressed upon Williams the importance of believers&#8217; baptism. Historians tend to think that Williams arrived there from his own study.</p>
<p>Williams had himself baptized by Ezekiel Holliman in late 1638. Thus was constituted a church which still survives as the First Baptist Church in America. A few years later, John Clarke, Williams’ compatriot in the cause of religious freedom in the New World, established a Baptist church in Newport, Rhode Island. In 1847 the Newport church suddenly maintained that it was the first Baptist church in America, but virtually all historians have dismissed this claim. If nothing else, Roger Williams had gathered and resigned from the Providence church before the town of Newport was even founded. Still, both Roger Williams and John Clarke are variously credited as being the founder of the Baptist faith in America.</p>
<p>It should be noted that Roger Williams was a Baptist only briefly. He remained with the little church in Providence only a few months. He became convinced that the ordinances, having been lost in the Apostasy [when Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire], they could not be validly restored without a special divine commission. He declared: &#8220;There is no regularly constituted church of Christ on earth, nor any person qualified to administer any church ordinances; nor can there be until new apostles are sent by the Great Head of the Church for whose coming I am seeking.&#8221;</p>
<p>He never again affiliated himself with any church, but remained deeply religious and active in preaching and praying. He looked forward to the time when Christ would send a new apostle to restore the church, but in the meantime, he would be a &#8220;witness&#8221; to Christianity. He always remained interested in the Baptists, being in agreement with them in their rejection of infant baptism as in most other matters. He has been mistakenly called a &#8220;Seeker&#8221;, both in his own time by his enemies and by his admirers in the last century. Some of his enemies in England called him a “Seeker” in an attempt to smear him by associating him with a heretical movement that accepted Socianism and universal salvation. Both of these ideas were anathema to Williams. He was like a Seeker only in his rejection of any visible church as being a true church. A twentieth century biographer revived the Seeker label, but regarded it as a positive thing, and it caught on.</p>
<p>Roger Williams was by no means the first to advocate separation of church and state, but he was the first to establish a place where it could be practiced. The General Baptists in England had advocated separation as early as 1611, and the first two pastors of the first Baptist church in England died in prison for these beliefs. Williams had read their writings, and his own experience of persecution by Archbishop Laud and the Anglican establishment and the bloody wars of religion that raged in Europe at that very time convinced him that a state church had no basis in Scripture. Clearly he had arrived at this conclusion before he landed in Boston in 1631 because he criticized the Massachusetts Bay system immediately for mixing church and state. He declared that the state could legitimately concern itself only with matters of civil order, but not religious belief. The state had no business in trying to enforce the “first Table” of the Ten Commandments, those first commandments that dealt with the relationship between God and persons. The state must confine itself to the commandments that dealt with the relations between people: murder, theft, adultery, lying, honoring parents, and so forth. He regarded any effort by the state to dictate religion or promote any particular religious idea or practice to be “forced worship.” And he colorfully declared that “forced worship stinks in the nostrils of God.” He would write that he saw no warrant in the New Testament to use the sword to promote religious belief. Indeed, he said that Constantine had been a worse enemy to true Christianity than Nero because Constantine’s support had corrupted Christianity and led to the death of the Christian church. In the strongest language he described the attempt to compel belief to be rape of the soul, and he spoke of the “oceans of blood” shed as a result of trying to command conformity. He believed that the moral principles found in the Scriptures ought to inform the civil magistrates, but he observed that well ordered, just, and civil governments existed where Christianity was not present. All governments were required to maintain civil order and justice, but none had a warrant to promote any religion.</p>
<p>Most of William’s contemporaries and critics regarded his ideas as a prescription for chaos and anarchy. The vast majority believed that each nation must have its national church and that dissenters had to be compelled to conform. The establishment of Rhode Island was so threatening to its neighbors that they tried for the next hundred years to extinguish the “lively experiment” in religious freedom that had begun in 1636.</p>
<p>Williams died sometime between January 28 and March 15, 1683 and was buried on his own property. Fifty years later, his house had collapsed into the cellar and the location of his grave forgotten. In 1860, Zachariah Allen sought to locate his remains, but found nothing. In the grave that Allen thought was that of Williams, he found the apple tree root, but little else. Some dirt from the hole was placed in the Randall family mausoleum in the North Burial Ground. In anticipation of the 300th anniversary of the founding of Providence, the dirt was retrieved from the mausoleum and placed in an urn and kept at the Rhode Island Historical Society until a proper monument was erected at Prospect Terrace Park in Providence. The actual deposit of the “dust from the grave of Roger Williams” did not occur until 1939 when the WPA finished the monument. The apple tree root is now regarded as a curio and kept by the Rhode Island Historical Society at the John Brown House Museum.</p>
<p>Williams&#8217;s career as an author began with A Key into the Language of America (London, 1643), written during his first voyage to England. His next publication was Mr. Cotton&#8217;s Letter lately Printed, Examined and Answered (London, 1644; reprinted, with Cotton&#8217;s letter, which it answered, in Publications of the Narragansett Club, vol. ii.).</p>
<p>The Bloody Tenent of Persecution, for Cause of Conscience soon followed (London, 1644). This is his most famous work, and was the ablest statement and defense of the principle of absolute liberty of conscience that had appeared in any language. It is in the form of a dialogue between Truth and Peace, and well illustrates the vigor of his style.</p>
<p>During the same year an anonymous pamphlet appeared in London which now is ascribed to Williams, entitled: Queries of Highest Consideration Proposed to Mr. Tho. Goodwin, Mr. Phillip Nye, Mr. Wil. Bridges, Mr. Jer. Burroughs, Mr. Sidr. Simpson, all Independents, etc. These Independents were members of the Westminster Assembly and their Apologetical Narration, sought to find a way between extreme Separatism and Presbyterianism, and their prescription was the acceptance of the model of Massachusetts Bay. Williams attacked their arguments for the very same reasons that he found that Massachusetts Bay violated liberty of conscience.</p>
<p>In 1652, during his second visit to England, Williams published The Bloody Tenent yet more Bloody: by Mr. Cotton&#8217;s Endeavor to wash it white in the Blood of the Lamb; of whose precious Blood, spilt in the Bloud of his Servants; and of the Blood of Millions spilt in former and later Wars for Conscience sake, that most Bloody Tenent of Persecution for cause of Conscience, upon, a second Tryal is found more apparently and more notoriously guilty, etc. (London, 1652). This work reiterated and amplified the arguments in Bloody Tenent; but it has the advantage of being written in answer to Cotton&#8217;s elaborate defense of New England persecution, A Reply to Mr. Williams his Examination (Publications of the Narragansett Club, vol. ii.).</p>
<p>Other works by Williams are:</p>
<p>    * The Hireling Ministry None of Christ&#8217;s’’ (London, 1652)<br />
    * Experiments of Spiritual Life and Health, and their Preservatives (London, 1652; reprinted Providence, 1863)<br />
    * George Fox Digged out of his Burrowes (Boston, 1676).</p>
<p>A volume of his letters is included in the Narragansett Club edition of Williams&#8217;s Works (7 vols., Providence, 1866–74), and a volume was edited by J. R. Bartlett (1882).</p>
<p>    * The Correspondence of Roger Williams, 2 vols., Rhode Island Historical Society, 1988, edited by Glenn W. LaFantasie.</p>
<p>Williams intended to become a missionary to the Native Americans and set out to learn their language. He studied their language, customs, religion, family life and other aspects of their world. As a result he came to see their point of view about colonization and developed a deep appreciation of them as people. He wrote his A Key into the Language of America (1643) as a kind of phrase book coupled with observations about life and culture as an aid in communication with the Indians. In it he talked about everything from salutations in the first chapter to death and burial in chapter 32. The book also sought to instruct the English, who thought of themselves as vastly superior to the Native Americans, that they were mistaken. He repeatedly made the point that the Indians were just as good as the English, even superior in some respects.</p>
<p>&#8220;Boast not proud English, of thy birth & blood; Thy brother Indian is by birth as Good. Of one blood God made Him, and Thee and All, As wise, as fair, as strong, as personal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Having learned their language and customs, Williams gave up the idea of being a missionary and never baptized a single Indian. He was severely criticized by the Puritans for failing to Christianize them, but Williams had arrived at the place in his own thinking that no valid church existed. He said he could have baptized the whole country, but it would have been hypocritical and false. He formed firm friendships and developed deep trust among the Native Americans, especially the Narragansetts. He was able to keep the peace between the Indians and English in Rhode Island for nearly forty years because of his constant mediation and negotiation. He twice surrendered himself as a hostage to the Indians to guarantee the safe return of a great sachem from a summons to a court: Pessicus in 1645 and Metacomet (King Philip) in 1671. He more than any other Englishman was trusted by the Native Americans and proved to be trustworthy. In the end King Philip’s War (1675–1676) was one of the bitterest events in his life as his efforts ended with the burning of Providence in March 1676, including his own house.</p>
<p>Moore (1963) traces the &#8216;negative&#8217; approach of the orthodox Puritan writers (Bradford, Winthrop, Morton, Cotton Mather, Hutchinson, Winsor, and Dexter), the &#8216;romantic&#8217; approach (George Bancroft, Vernon Parrington, Ernst, and Brockunier) and the &#8216;realistic&#8217; approach (Backus, H. Richard Niebuhr, Roland Bainton, and Hudson), and regards the work of Mauro Calamandrei, who was followed by Perry Miller and Ola Winslow, as crucial. The realistic writers created a synthesis of the earlier interpretations.</p>
<p>Williams has been considered an American hero ever since the Puritans of his own day stopped dominating historical interpretations. His defense of Native Americans, accusations that Puritans had reproduced the evils of the Anglican Church, and denial that the king had authority to grant charters for colonies put him at the center of nearly every political debate during his life. By the time of American independence, however, he was considered a defender of religious freedom and has continued to be praised by generations of historians who have often altered their interpretation of his period as a whole. Historians have been able to appropriate Williams because he was unusual, prolific, and vague.</p>
<p>    * Roger Williams Cenotaph in Green-Wood Cemetery, Brooklyn, Kings County, N.Y.<br />
    * Roger Williams National Memorial, established in 1965, is a park in downtown Providence.<br />
    * Roger Williams Park, Providence, Rhode Island, and the Roger Williams Park Zoo within it are named in his honor.<br />
    * Roger Williams University, in Bristol, Rhode Island, is named in his honor.<br />
    * Roger Williams Dining Hall, at the University of Rhode Island, was named after the co-founder of Rhode Island. Today, it is fondly referred to as &#8220;Rojo&#8217;s.&#8221;<br />
    * The Green Lake Conference Center (American Baptists), founded in 1943, in Green Lake, Wisconsin, has dedicated its main lodge as the, &#8220;Roger Williams Inn.&#8221;<br />
    * Roger Williams was selected in 1872 to represent Rhode Island in the National Statuary Hall Collection in the United States Capitol.<br />
    * Roger Williams is depicted, with other prominent reformers, on the International Monument to the Reformation in Geneva, Switzerland.<br />
    * An album The Bloudy Tenent Truth Peace by Slim Cessna&#8217;s Auto Club makes an allusion to Roger William&#8217;s 1644 book, The Bloudy Tenent of Persecution for Cause of Conscience and features He, Roger Williams. A song dedicated to him as being the founder of the first Baptist church in America.<br />
    * Williams is honored with Anne Hutchinson with a feast day on the liturgical of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America on February 5.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Williams_(theologian)">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/04/26/welcome-to-rhode-island-genealogy/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">Welcome to Rhode Island Genealogy!!!</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=359&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/28/roger-williams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wampanoag Language</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/14/wampanoag-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/14/wampanoag-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wampanoag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wampanoag originally spoke a dialect of the Massachusett-Wampanoag language, which belongs to the Algonquian languages family. Currently English speaking, the Wampanoag are spearheading a language revival under the direction of the &#8220;Wampanoag Language Reclamation Project.&#8221; The rapid decline of the Wampanoag language began after the American Revolution. At this time, New England Native American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wampanoag originally spoke a dialect of the Massachusett-Wampanoag language, which belongs to the Algonquian languages family. Currently English speaking, the Wampanoag are spearheading a language revival under the direction of the &#8220;Wampanoag Language Reclamation Project.&#8221;</p>
<p>The rapid decline of the Wampanoag language began after the American Revolution. At this time, New England Native American communities suffered from huge gender imbalances due to premature male deaths, especially due to military and maritime activity. Consequently, many Wampanoag women were forced to marry outside their linguistic groups, making it extremely difficult to maintain the various Wampanoag dialects.</p>
<p><span id="more-348"></span><br />
</p>
<p>In 1997, Jessie Little Doe Baird (Mashpee Wampanoag), instituted the &#8220;Wampanoag Language Reclamation Project&#8221;, along with Helen Manning, (Aquinnah Wampanoag). Baird&#8217;s stated purpose was the revival of the Wampanoag language; that Wampanoag tribal members should once again become fluent in Wampanoag and speak Wampanoag within their tribal territories. Seventeenth-century printed texts provide a basis, including the translation of the 1663 Eliot Bible (a Bible translated into Massachuseuk by converts under the direction of missionary John Eliot), as well as examples from related neighboring Algonquian languages. Today Baird teaches classes in Mashpee and Aquinnah. Only Wampanoag is spoken during the lessons, and only Wampanoag people are permitted to attend classes. Baird is also compiling a Wampanoag dictionary which currently contains roughly 8,600 words, and through the initiative of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, has begun to implement a language reclamation project there.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wampanoag_(tribe)">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/28/the-wampanoag-people/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">The Wampanoag People</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=348&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/14/wampanoag-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wampanoag People</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/28/the-wampanoag-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/28/the-wampanoag-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wampanoag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wampanoag (pronounced /ˌwɑːmpəˈnoʊ.æɡ/; Wôpanâak in the Wampanoag language; alternate spellings Wompanoag or Wampanig) are a Native American nation which currently consists of five tribes. In 1600 the Wampanoag lived in southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island, as well as within a territory that encompassed current day Martha&#8217;s Vineyard, Nantucket and the Elizabeth Islands. Their population [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wampanoag (pronounced /ˌwɑːmpəˈnoʊ.æɡ/; Wôpanâak in the Wampanoag language; alternate spellings Wompanoag or Wampanig) are a Native American nation which currently consists of five tribes.</p>
<p>In 1600 the Wampanoag lived in southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island, as well as within a territory that encompassed current day Martha&#8217;s Vineyard, Nantucket and the Elizabeth Islands. Their population numbered about 12,000.</p>
<p><span id="more-347"></span><br />
</p>
<p>Historical Wampanoag leaders included:</p>
<p>    * Massasoit, who met the English;</p>
<p>    * Massasoit&#8217;s oldest son Wamsutta (known by the English as King Alexander) who died under mysterious circumstances after visiting with English colonial administrators in Plymouth;<br />
    * His second son Metacom or Metacomet (King Philip), who initiated the war against the English known as King Philip&#8217;s War in retaliation for the death of his brother at the hands of the English;<br />
    * Sachem Weetamoo of the Pocasset, a woman who supported Metacom and drowned crossing the Taunton River while fleeing the English;<br />
    * Sachem Awashonks of the Sakonnet, a woman who at first fought the English but then changed sides; and<br />
    * Annawan, a war leader.</p>
<p>In 1616, John Smith erroneously referred to the entire Wampanoag confederacy as the Pakanoket. Pakanoket continued to be used in the earliest colonial records and reports. The Pakanoket tribal seat was located near present-day Bristol, Rhode Island. Wampanoag means ‘’People of the First Light.’’ The word Wapanoos was first seen on Adriaen Block&#8217;s 1614 map and was the earliest European representation of Wampanoag territory. Other synonyms include ‘’Wapenock, Massasoit’’ and ‘’Philip&#8217;s Indians’’.</p>
<p>group 	Area inhabited<br />
Gay Head or Aquinnah 	western point of Martha&#8217;s Vineyard<br />
Chappaquiddick 	Chappaquiddick Island<br />
Nantucket 	Nantucket Island<br />
Nauset 	Cape Cod<br />
Mashpee 	Cape Cod<br />
Patuxet 	eastern Massachusetts, on Plymouth Bay<br />
Pokanoket 	eastern Massachusetts, near present-day Bristol<br />
Pocasset 	present day north Fall River,Massachusetts<br />
Herring Pond 	Plymouth &#038; Cape Cod<br />
Assonet 	Freetown<br />
and approximately 50 more groups 	</p>
<p>The Wampanoag were semi-sedentary, with seasonal movements between fixed sites in present-day southern New England. The &#8220;three sisters,&#8221; corn (maize), beans and squash were the staples of their diet, supplemented by fish and game. More specifically, each community had authority over a well-defined territory from which the people derived their livelihood through a seasonal round of fishing, planting, harvesting and hunting. Because southern New England was thickly populated, hunting grounds had strictly defined boundaries. Land was hereditary and descent was reckoned matrilineally, wherein both hereditary status and claims to land were passed down through women. Mothers with claims to specific plots of land used for farming or hunting passed those claims to their female descendants, irrespective of their marital status.</p>
<p>The work of making a living was organized on a family level. Families gathered together in the spring to fish, in early winter to hunt and in the summer they separated to cultivate individual planting fields. Boys were schooled in the way of the woods, where a man&#8217;s skill at hunting and ability to survive under all conditions were vital to his family&#8217;s well being. Women were trained from their earliest years to work diligently in the fields and around the family wetu, a round or oval house that was designed to be easily dismantled and moved in just a few hours.</p>
<p>The production of food among the Wampanoag was similar to that of many Native American societies. Food habits were divided along gendered lines. Men and women had specific tasks and Native women played an active role in many of the stages of food production. Since the Wampanoag relied primarily on goods garnered from this kind of work, women had important socio-political, economic, and spiritual roles in their communities. Wampanoag men were mainly responsible for hunting and fishing, while women took care of farming and the gathering of wild fruits, nuts, berries, shellfish, etc. Women were responsible for up to seventy-five percent of all food production in Wampanoag societies.</p>
<p>The Wampanoag were organized into a confederation, where a head sachem, or political leader, presided over a number of other sachems. The English often referred to the sachem as “king,” a title that misled more than it clarified since the position of a sachem differed in many ways from that of a king. Sachems were bound to consult not only their own councilors within their tribe but also any of the “petty sachems,” or people of influence, in the region. They were also responsible for arranging trade privileges as well as protecting their allies in exchange for material tribute. Both women and men could hold the position of sachem, and women were sometimes chosen over close male relatives. Two Martha&#8217;s Vineyard and Nantucket Wampanoag female sachems, Wunnatuckquannumou and Askamaboo, presided despite the competition of male contenders, including near relatives, for their power. These women gained power because their matrilineal clans held sway over large plots of land and they themselves had accrued enough status and power—not because they were the widows of former sachems.</p>
<p>Pre-marital sexual experimentation was accepted, although once couples opted to marry, the Wampanoag expected fidelity within unions. Roger Williams (1603–1683), stated that “single fornication they count no sin, but after Marriage, (which they solemnize by consent of Parents and publique approbation&#8230;) then they count it heinous for either of them to be false.” In addition, polygamy was practiced among the Wampanoag, although monogamy was the norm. Even within Wampanoag society where status was constituted within a matrilineal, matrifocal society, some elite men could take several wives for political or social reasons. Multiple wives were also a path to and symbol of wealth because women were the producers and distributors of corn and other food products. However, as within most Native American societies, marriage and conjugal unions were not as important as ties of clan and kinship. Marriages could be and were dissolved relatively easily, but family and clan relations were of extreme and lasting importance, constituting the ties that bound individuals to one another and their tribal territories as a whole.</p>
<p>In 1524, King Francis I of France commissioned Giovanni Da Verrazzano to lead an expedition to the &#8220;New World&#8221;. Verrazzano likely reached present-day North Carolina one point south of present-day Cape Fear. He first traveled south but turned north for fear of encountering the Spanish who had established outposts in present-day Florida. When Verrazzano reached Newport Harbor, he attempted to contact the Wampanoag Indians to initiate trade relations</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wampanoag_(tribe)">Wikipedia</a></p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=347&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/28/the-wampanoag-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Niantic People</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/14/the-niantic-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/14/the-niantic-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Niantic, or in their own language, the Nehântick or Nehantucket were a tribe of New England Native Americans, who were living in Connecticut and Rhode Island during the early colonial period. Due to intrusions of the Pequot, the Niantic were divided into an eastern and western division. The Western Niantic were subject to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Niantic, or in their own language, the Nehântick or Nehantucket were a tribe of New England Native Americans, who were living in Connecticut and Rhode Island during the early colonial period. Due to intrusions of the Pequot, the Niantic were divided into an eastern and western division. The Western Niantic were subject to the Pequot and lived just east of the mouth of the Connecticut River while the Eastern Niantic became very close allies to the Narragansett.</p>
<p>The division of the Niantic became so great that the language of the eastern Niantic is classified as a dialect of Narragansett while the language of the western Niantic is classified as Pequot-Mohegan.</p>
<p><span id="more-343"></span><br />
</p>
<p>The Niantic were an Algonquian speaking people, speaking an Algonquian Y-dialect, similar to their neighbours the Pequot, Montauk, Mohegan, and Narragansett. The tribe&#8217;s name &#8220;Nehantic&#8221; (Nehântick) means &#8220;of long-necked waters&#8221; believed by local residents to refer to the &#8220;long neck&#8221; or peninsula of land now known as Black Point; located in the village of Niantic, Connecticut. The Nehântics spent their summers fishing and digging the shellfish which were once abundant there and for which the area is famous (see Millstone Nuclear Power Plant). They lived on corn, beans, and squash, supplemented by hunting, fishing, and collecting.</p>
<p>Conflict broke out between the Niantic and their colonial neighbors, leading to punitive military expeditions that dealt out massive destruction in contrast to the rather limited incidents that had provoked the conflict. As the violence became more widespread it evolved into the Pequot War in 1637. This conflict resulted in almost total destruction of the Western Niantic, whose roughly 100 remaining members merged into the Mohegans and Pequots. There are members of these tribes who can trace their ancestry back to Nehântick members, especially in the vicinity of Lyme, Connecticut. Some of the Niantic who joined the Mohegan and Pequot fled west and joined the Brotherton Indians to escape further English harassment.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Following King Philip&#8217;s War (1675-76), surviving Narragansett fled to the Eastern Niantic in such great numbers that the tribe became known as the Narragansett, however, many modern-day Narragansett have significant Niantic blood.</p>
<p>By 1870, the Nehantics were declared extinct by the state and their 300-acre reservation, the Black Point peninsula of East Lyme, was sold. In 1886, their burial ground was sold and desecrated, and the Crescent beach community filled over it. As recently as 1988, Nehantic skeletal remains were uncovered by new construction.</p>
<p>The East Lyme Public Library has some information, mainly as small booklets that were researched and written by local historians and that reference Mercy Matthews and many other Nehantic Indians.</p>
<p>In 1998, about 35 Connecticut families claiming Nehantic descent incorporated as a nonprofit association, the Nehantic Tribe and Nation, established a three-person governing board, researched their history more fully, and began the petition process of seeking recognition from the Federal government as an Indian tribe.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niantic_(tribe)">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<div id="wherego_related"> </div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=343&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/14/the-niantic-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Narragansett language</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/28/narragansett-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/28/narragansett-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narragansett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mohegan-Montauk-Narragansett (also known as Pequot-Mohegan, Narrangansett, Montauk, Secatogue, Stockbridge, Shinnecock-Poosepatuck) is an extinct Algonquian language formerly spoken in part of what is now known as New England and Long Island. The earliest study of the language in English was by Roger Williams, founder of the Rhode Island colony, in his book A Key Into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mohegan-Montauk-Narragansett (also known as Pequot-Mohegan, Narrangansett, Montauk, Secatogue, Stockbridge, Shinnecock-Poosepatuck) is an extinct Algonquian language formerly spoken in part of what is now known as New England and Long Island.</p>
<p>The earliest study of the language in English was by Roger Williams, founder of the Rhode Island colony, in his book A Key Into the Language of America (1643), largely a study of the Narragansett language.</p>
<p>As of 2010, the Shinnecock and Unkechaug nations of Long Island, New York, had begun work with the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Southampton Campus, to revive their languages, or dialects of the above.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narragansett_language">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/14/wampanoag-language/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">The Wampanoag Language</a></li><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/11/28/roger-williams/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">Roger Williams</a></li><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/10/14/the-niantic-people/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">The Niantic People</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=341&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/28/narragansett-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Narragansett People</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/14/narragansett-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/14/narragansett-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narragansett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Narragansett tribe are a Algonquian Native American tribe from Rhode Island. Today they are enrolled in the Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island, a federally recognized tribe. The Narragansett tribe controls the Narragansett Indian Reservation, 1,800 acres (7.3 km2), or 3.357 square miles acres of trust lands in Charlestown, Rhode Island. A small portion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Narragansett tribe are a Algonquian Native American tribe from Rhode Island. Today they are enrolled in the Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island, a federally recognized tribe.</p>
<p>The Narragansett tribe controls the Narragansett Indian Reservation, 1,800 acres (7.3 km2), or 3.357 square miles acres of trust lands in Charlestown, Rhode Island. A small portion of the tribe resides on or near the reservation, whose population is 60, according to the 2000 U.S. Census.</p>
<p>Additionally, they own several hundred acres in Westerly.<br />
<span id="more-338"></span><br />
</p>
<p>In 1991 the Narragansetts purchased 31 acres (130,000 m2) in Charlestown for housing for the elderly. In 1998 they requested that DOI take the property into trust, thereby removing it from state and local control.</p>
<p>The tribe is led by an elected tribal council, a chief sachem, a medicine man, and a Christian leader. The entire tribal population must approve major decisions.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;Narragansett&#8221; means, literally, &#8220;People of the Small Point.&#8221; Traditionally the tribe spoke the Narragansett language, an Algonquian language. The language went almost extinct, but tribal members are trying to revive it from books in the early 20th century and then teach it to the next generations. The Narragansett spoke a Y-dialect, similar enough to the N-dialects of the Massachusett and Wampanoag to be mutually intelligible. Other Y-dialects include the Shinnecock and Pequot languages.</p>
<p>In the 17th century, Roger Williams, a co-founder of Rhode Island, learned the tribe&#8217;s language, documenting it in his 1643 work, A Key Into the Language of America. Williams gave the tribe&#8217;s name as &#8220;Nanhigganeuck&#8221;, of which &#8220;Narragansett&#8221; seems to be an English corruption. American English has absorbed a number of loan words from Narragansett and other closely related languages such as Wampanoag and Massachusett. Such words include &#8220;quahog,&#8221; &#8220;papoose,&#8221; &#8220;powwow,&#8221; &#8220;squash, and &#8220;succotash.&#8221;</p>
<p>Early history</p>
<p>They were historically one of the leading tribes of New England, controlling the west of Narragansett Bay in present-day Rhode Island, and also portions of Connecticut and eastern Massachusetts, from the Providence River on the northeast to Pawcatuck River on the southwest. The Narragansett culture has existed in the region for centuries. with extensive trade relations. The first European contact was in 1524, when Giovanni de Verrazano visited Narragansett Bay.<br />
17th century</p>
<p>They escaped the epidemics that ravaged tribes further south on the coast in 1617. European settlement in their territory did not begin until 1635, and in 1636 Roger Williams acquired land use rights from the Narragansett sachems. It was later that Europeans and Native Americans realized they had different conceptions of land use.</p>
<p>As the Native Americans suffered extensive losses from King Philip&#8217;s War, the Narragansett absorbed members of other, smaller tribes to keep an Indian identity. The Niantic tribe became fully merged into the Narragansett. During colonial and later times, tribe members also intermarried with Europeans, Africans, and African-Americans, making spouses and children part of the tribe and keeping a tribal identity.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Between 1616 and 1619, pandemics originating from infectious diseases carried by European fishermen killed thousands of New England Algonquians. When the English started colonizing New England in 1620, the Narragansetts had not been affected by the epidemic and were the most powerful native nation in the southern area of the region. Massasoit of the Wampanoag nation allied himself to the English at Plymouth as a way to protect the Wampanoags from Narragansett attacks.</p>
<p>In the fall of 1621, the Narragansetts sent a &#8220;gift&#8221; of a snakeskin filled with arrows to the newly established English colony at Plymouth. The &#8220;gift&#8221; was really a threatening challenge. The governor of Plymouth, William Bradford, sent the snakeskin back, but this time it was filled with bullets. The Narragansetts understood the message and did not attack the colony.</p>
<p>In 1636, the Narragansett sachems (leaders), Canonicus and Miantonomi sold the land that became Providence to Roger Williams. During the Pequot War, the Narragansetts were allied with the New England colonists. However, the brutality of the English shocked the Narragansetts, who returned home in disgust. After the defeat of the Pequot, there was ongoing conflict with the Mohegans over control of the conquered Pequot land.</p>
<p>In 1643 the Narragansetts under Miantonomi invaded what is now eastern Connecticut. The plan was to subdue the Mohegan nation and its leader Uncas. Miantonomi had between 900-1000 men under his command. The invasion turned into a fiasco, and Miantonomi was captured and then executed by Uncas&#8217; brother. The following year, the new war leader Pessicus of the Narragansetts renewed the war with the Mohegan. With each success, the number of Narragansett allies grew. The Mohegans were on the verge of defeat when the English came and saved them. The English sent troops to defend the Mohegan fort at Shantok. When the English threatened to invade Narragansett territory, Canonicus and his son Mixanno signed a peace treaty. The peace would last for the next thirty years, but the encroachment by the growing colonial population gradually began to erode any accords between natives and settlers.</p>
<p>As missionaries began to convert tribal members, many natives feared the assimilation of native traditions into colonial culture. The colonial push for religious conversion collided with native resistance to assimilation. In 1675, John Sassamon, a converted &#8220;Praying Indian&#8221;, was found bludgeoned to death in a pond. Facts about Sassamon&#8217;s death never surfaced. Historians accept that Metacomet, the Wampanoag Sachem, may have ordered the execution of Sassamon because of his cooperation with colonial authorities despite the growing discontent among Wampanoags. Three Wampanoags were arrested, convicted, and hanged for Sassamon&#8217;s death. Metacomet subsequently declared war on the colonists.</p>
<p>Metacomet escaped the attempt to trap him in the Plymouth Colony and the uprising spread across Massachusetts as other bands, such as the Nipmucs joined the fight. They waged successful attacks on settlements in Massachusetts and Connecticut, but Rhode Island was spared at the beginning as the Narragansetts remained officially neutral. However, the leaders of the United Colonies (Massachusetts, Plymouth, and Connecticut) accused the Narragansetts of harboring Wampanoag refugees. As a result, the United Colonies made a preemptive attack on the Narragansett palisaded fortress in Rhode Island on December 19, 1675 in what became known as the Great Swamp Fight. Hundreds of old men, women, and children perished in the battle and burning of the fortress, but nearly all the warriors escaped to fight another day. The Indians retaliated with their great spring offensive beginning in February 1676 which saw the destruction of all white settlement on the western side of Narragansett Bay, including the burning of Providence on March 27, 1676. Among the houses destroyed was Roger Williams&#8217; home. All over New England the Indian offensive led to the destruction of many towns and the attackers raided the suburbs of Boston. In spite of waging a successful campaign against the colonists, by the end of March, disease, starvation, battle loses, and the lack of powder caused the Indian effort to collapse.</p>
<p>Rading parties from Connecticut composed of the colonists and Indian allies, such as the Pequots and Mohegans,swept into Rhode Island and killed substantial numbers of the now-weakened Narragansetts. A mixed force of Mohegans and Connecticut militia captured Canonchet, the chief sachem of the Narragansetts, just a few days after the destruction of Providence and delivered him to Connecticut authorities. When he was told he was to die, he replied, &#8220;I like it well that I should die before my heart has grown soft and I have said anything unworthy of myself&#8221;. He asked to be executed by Uncas, chief sachem of the Mohegans. Uncas and two Pequot sachems closest to Canonchet&#8217;s rank among his captors executed him in Indian style. That done, the English treated Canonchet as a traitor, and his body was drawn and quartered. Metacomet, himself, was hunted down by a mixed force of Plymouth militia and fellow Wampanoags and shot by Alderman, who had earlier served with Metacomet. The war ended in southern New England even though it dragged on in Maine for another year. After the war, some surviving Narragansetts were sold into slavery and shipped to the Caribbean, others became indentured servants in Rhode Island or were merged with local tribes, particularly the Eastern Niantics. Earlier, in January 1676, Joshua Tefft was executed at Smith&#8217;s Castle in Wickford, Rhode Island. He was an English colonist who fought on the side of the Narragansett during the Great Swamp Fight of King Philip&#8217;s War.<br />
18th century</p>
<p>In the 1740s during the First Great Awakening, colonists founded the Narragansett Indian Church, to try to convert more natives to Christianity. The church and its surrounding 3 acres (12,000 m2) were the only property never to leave tribal ownership. This continuous ownership was critical evidence of continuity during the tribe&#8217;s long documentation and success in gaining Federal recognition in 1983.<br />
 19th century</p>
<p>In the 19th century, the tribe resisted repeated state efforts to declare it no longer valid because of intermarriage with other settlers. Tribal leaders resisted increasing legislative pressure after the Civil War to &#8220;take up citizenship&#8221; in the United States, which required them to give up their treaty privileges and Indian nation status. In testimony to the legislature, a Narragansett spokesperson explained that they saw injustices under existing US citizenship, and pointed to Jim Crow rules then in effect that limited citizenship of blacks despite their rights under the law. They also resisted the idea that any black ancestry was more important than all other ancestry in defining tribal identity. As the Narragansett saw it, they had brought people of European and African ancestry into their tribal nation by marriage and they became Narragansett.</p>
<p>    &#8220;We are not negroes, we are the heirs of Ninagrit, and of the great chiefs and warriors of the Narragansetts. Because, when your ancestors stole the negro from Africa and brought him amongst us and made a slave of him, we extended him the hand of friendship, and permitted his blood to be mingled with ours, are we to be called negroes? And to be told that we may be made negro citizens? We claim that while one drop of Indian blood remains in our veins, we are entitled to the rights and privileges guaranteed by your ancestors to ours by solemn treaty, which without a breach of faith you cannot violate.&#8221;</p>
<p> The Narragansett Indians thus had a vision of themselves as &#8220;a nation rather than a race&#8221;, and it was a multiracial nation. They insisted on their rights to Indian national status and its privileges by treaty.</p>
<p>The state persisted in its efforts at &#8220;detribalization&#8221; from 1880-1884. While the tribe agreed to negotiations for sale of its land, it quickly regretted its action and set about to try to regain the land. In 1880 there were 324 Narragansett tribal members recognized as claimants to the land during negotiations. Although the state put up tribal lands for public sale in the 19th century, the tribe did not disperse and continued to practice its culture.<br />
20th century<br />
The Narragansett Indian Church in Charlestown was founded in the 1740s. Constructed in 1994, this building replaced one that burned down.</p>
<p>Although they lost control of much of their tribal lands during the state&#8217;s late 19th century &#8220;detribalization&#8221;, Narragansetts kept a group identity. Among the most notable tribal members was 2-time Boston Marathon winner and 1936 U.S. Olympian Ellison &#8220;Tarzan&#8221; Brown. In the 20th century, they took action to have more control over their future. They regained 1,800 acres (7.3 km2) of their land in 1978, and in 1983 gained Federal recognition as a tribe. According to tribal rolls, there are approximately 2,400 members of the Narragansett Tribe today, most of which are of heritage mixed between Narragansett, many other tribes of the New England area, as well as with European and African descent and very few tribal members who are at least of half Narragansett descent or more.</p>
<p>The tribe incorporated in 1900 and built its longhouse in 1940 as a place for gatherings and ceremonies.</p>
<p>In January 1975 the Narragansett Tribe filed suit in Federal court to regain 3,200 acres (13 km2) of aboriginal land in southern Rhode Island which they claimed the state had illegally taken from them in 1880. The 1880 Act&#8217;s authorizing the state to negotiate with the tribe listed 324 Narragansetts approved by the Supreme Court as claimants to the land. In 1978 the Narragansett Tribe signed a Joint Memorandum of Understanding (JMOU) with the state of Rhode Island, Town of Charlestown, and private property owners in settlement of their land claim. A total of 1,800 acres (7.3 km2) was transferred to a corporation formed to hold the land in trust for descendants of the 1880 Narragansett Roll, in exchange for agreeing that, except for hunting and fishing, the laws of Rhode Island would be in effect on those lands, since the Narragansett did not have federal status given back to them as of yet. Since the tribe had no federal status, they were left with no choice but to agree to the state&#8217;s stipulations.</p>
<p>The tribe prepared extensive documentation of its genealogy and proof of continuity with the 324 tribal members of treaty status. In 1979 the tribe applied for Federal recognition, which it finally regained in 1983 as the Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island (the official name used by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.</p>
<p>The museum of the Narragansett is the Tomaquag Indian Memorial Museum in Exeter, Rhode Island. The school for the Narragansett children is the Nuweetooun School at the same museum.</p>
<p>Notable Narragansett people</p>
<p>    * Ellison &#8220;Tarzan&#8221; Brown (1914–1975), marathon runner and Olympic athlete<br />
    * Canonicus (ca. 1565–1647), chief and diplomat<br />
    * Miantonomoh (ca. 1565–1643), chief and nephew of Canonicus<br />
    * Russell Spears (1917-2009), stonemason<br />
    * Sonny Dove (1945–1983), basketball player</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narragansett_(tribe)">Wikipedia</a></p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/04/26/welcome-to-rhode-island-genealogy/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">Welcome to Rhode Island Genealogy!!!</a></li><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/28/miantonomoh/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">Miantonomoh</a></li><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/28/narragansett-language/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">The Narragansett language</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=338&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/14/narragansett-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miantonomoh</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/28/miantonomoh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/28/miantonomoh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miantonomoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narragansett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miantonomoh (1565? &#8211; August 1643), also spelled Miantonomo or Miantonomah, was a chief of the Narragansett tribe of New England Indians, nephew of their grand sachem, Canonicus (died 1647). He seems to have been friendly to the English colonists of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, though he was accused of being treacherous. In 1636, when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miantonomoh (1565? &#8211; August 1643), also spelled Miantonomo or Miantonomah, was a chief of the Narragansett tribe of New England Indians, nephew of their grand sachem, Canonicus (died 1647). He seems to have been friendly to the English colonists of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, though he was accused of being treacherous.</p>
<p>In 1636, when under suspicion, Miantonomoh went to Boston to prove his loyalty to the colonists. In the following year, during the Pequot War, he permitted John Mason to lead his Connecticut expedition against the Pequot Indians through Narraganset country. The Pequot were defeated in this war. In 1638, he signed for the Narraganset the tripartite treaty between that tribe, the Connecticut colonists and the Mohegan Indians, which provided for a perpetual peace between the parties, and Miantonomoh was given control over eighty of the two hundred Pequot. However, conflict continued with the Mohegans over control of the Pequot people and land. Miantonomoh tried to organize other tribes throughout the English colonies in a union against the English.</p>
<p><span id="more-336"></span><br />
</p>
<p>The conflict with the Mohegans turned into a war in 1643. Miantonomoh invaded Mohegan territory with nearly 1,000 warriors, but was defeated. Miantonomoh was slowed by his coat of mail and was taken prisoner. Miantonomoh suggested an alliance against the English to the sachem of the Mohegans, Uncas, but instead Uncas turned him over to the Connecticut authorities at Hartford.</p>
<p>Miantonomoh was tried in Boston by the commissioners of the United Colonies of New England. A committee of five clergymen, to whom his case was referred, found him guilty. Although Miantonomoh had made war with their consent, they advised that he should be killed and gave Uncas authority to kill him. Miantonomoh was taken back to Norwich, where he had been defeated, and killed with a tomahawk by Wawequa, the brother of Uncas.</p>
<p>    * Four ships in the United States Navy have been named for him, two as Miantonomoh and two as Miantonomah.<br />
    * There is a monument to Miantonomo in Sachem&#8217;s Park, Norwich, Connecticut.<br />
    * Miantonomi Memorial Park in Newport, Rhode Island</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miantonomoh">Wikipedia</a>.</p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/09/14/narragansett-people/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">The Narragansett People</a></li><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/14/canonicus/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">Canonicus</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=336&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/28/miantonomoh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canonicus</title>
		<link>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/14/canonicus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/14/canonicus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 06:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rhodeisland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historical Reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canonicus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narragansett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Peoples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canonicus (c. 1565 – June 4, 1647) was a Native American chief of the Narragansett. He was a firm friend of English settlers. Canonicus was born around 1565. He was chief of the Narragansett tribe when the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth, and one of the first with whom they had dealings. In 1622, he was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canonicus (c. 1565 – June 4, 1647) was a Native American chief of the Narragansett. He was a firm friend of English settlers.</p>
<p>Canonicus was born around 1565. He was chief of the Narragansett tribe when the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth, and one of the first with whom they had dealings. In 1622, he was inclined to wage war against the colony. This was a serious matter, since he could muster about 3,000 warriors. As an intimation of his mood, he sent to the governor a bundle of arrows tied with a snake skin. The skin was filled with powder and bullets and returned. Negotiations followed this defiant answer, and peace was established outlasting the life of Canonicus.</p>
<p><span id="more-334"></span><br />
</p>
<p>When Roger Williams and his company felt constrained to withdraw from Massachusetts Bay Colony, they sought refuge at Narragansett, where Canonicus made them welcome. In 1636, he gave Williams the large tract of land which became the first nucleus of the colony of Providence Plantation. In 1637, Canonicus was largely responsible for the Narragansetts&#8217; decision to side with the English during the Pequot War.</p>
<p>Canonicus was succeeded by his nephew Miantonomoh; he returned to power after Miantonomoh was killed in 1643. On April 19, 1644, Canonicus made a formal treaty acknowledging the sovereignty of Britain. The influence of his counsels lasted for many years after his death, and the Narragansett tribe maintained peaceful relations with the English until King Philip&#8217;s War in 1675. </p>
<p>    * Four United States Navy ships have been named USS Canonicus.<br />
    * Camp Canonicus, an American Baptist camp in Exeter, Rhode Island.<br />
    * There is an avenue named after Canonicus in Newport, Rhode Island.<br />
    * The name of Conanicut Island.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonicus">Wikipedia</a></p>
<div id="wherego_related"><h3>Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/28/miantonomoh/" rel="bookmark" class="wherego_title">Miantonomoh</a></li><li>Powered by <a href="http://ajaydsouza.com/wordpress/plugins/where-did-they-go-from-here/">Where did they go from here?</a></li></ul></div><img src="http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=334&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net/2010/08/14/canonicus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Object Caching 1127/1256 objects using disk

Served from: www.rhodeisland-genealogy.net @ 2012-02-08 20:17:10 -->
